Editorial Standards

Humanoid Threats is an independent publication on humanoid robot and physical AI security. These are the rules every article, directory listing, tracker entry and newsletter issue follows.

1. Every claim is sourced

We link the primary source for every factual claim: the CVE record, the vendor advisory, the research paper, the court filing or the regulator. When only secondary reporting exists, we say so. We never publish rumors as facts.

2. Facts and analysis are separated

Reporting states what happened. Analysis, such as "why it matters for humanoid robot security", is labelled as our assessment, so readers can tell the difference.

3. How we use AI

Our articles are researched and drafted with AI assistance and edited for accuracy against the sources. Bylines on this site are pen names for our editorial desk, not individual journalists. We do not invent quotes, credentials, people or data.

4. Corrections

If we get something wrong, we fix it quickly and note the correction and its date at the end of the article. To report an error, email info@humanoidthreats.com with the link and the source that shows the right information.

5. Responsible disclosure

We only cover vulnerabilities that are already public. If you have found an unpatched flaw, report it to the vendor first. We do not publish working exploit code.

6. Independence

Directory listings are free and editorial; inclusion is not an endorsement. Sponsors and advertisers never influence our coverage, the vulnerability tracker or regular listings, and any sponsored content is clearly labelled. See Advertise.

7. Keeping pages current

Explainers, the vulnerability tracker and directory listings show a "last updated" or "last verified" date, and we revisit them when facts change.